Skip to main content

L.A.'s Anti-Camping Law Cost At Least $3 Million and Permanently Housed 2 People

In the foreground, a sign is attached to a pole and reads "Special Enforcement Zone," describing that no person shall sit, like, sleep or allow items to remain in the public right of way or risk removal. In the background, a person walks down a street instead of the sidewalk, which is full of blue tarps covering homeless camps.
Homeless encampment where a Special Enforcement Zone sign is posted on Bronson Avenue to enforce anti-camping law on Tuesday, April 5, 2022 in Los Angeles, CA. | Irfan Khan/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Support Provided By

LOS ANGELES (CNS) - In three years of an anti-camping law being in effect in Los Angeles, only two unhoused individuals were placed into permanent housing and cost more than $3 million to implement, according to a city memo released Friday.

The city's anti-camping policy, also known as 41.18 for the section of the Municipal Code it created, became law on Sept. 3, 2021. The law regulates where people can sit, lie, sleep or maintain personal property on or around specific public spaces.

The L.A. City Council approved the policy in an attempt to prevent obstruction of public spaces, address safety concerns and reduce homeless encampments across the city.

Over the course of three years, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and other service providers have engaged 174 encampments with a total of 1,856 unhoused individuals. Of the people engaged 313 were placed in temporary housing and two found permanent housing — a placement rate of approximately 17%.

The $3 million figure represents a minimum estimate.
Sharon Tso, Chief Legislative Analyst, City of Los Angeles

LAHSA reported that 81% of encampment sites were repopulated, but analysis of individual-level data showed that the average repopulation return across all 174 encampments was 39%, indicating that approximately 4 in 10 individuals returned to their original encampment within 14 days that 41.18 signs were posted by the city.

"Our office estimates that the city spent approximately $3 million on ordinance implementation between September 2021 and December 2023," Sharon Tso, chief legislative analyst, wrote in her memo.

"The $3 million figure represents a minimum estimate because multiple departments, including the Los Angeles Police Department, were unable to disaggregate their labor costs associated with 41.18-specific expenditures from their departmental expenditures."

California's homeless encampment ban failed to pass, without any plan to house the displaced.
Homeless Camp Ban Rejected

The report also notes that LAPD issued 3,183 citations to people for violating the city's anti-camping law between January 2021 to December 2023 — with about 75% coming out of the Devonshire, West Los Angeles and Rampart divisions.

"Areas with a greater number of citations are due to increased training on the proper policy and procedure for enforcement of LAMC (Los Angeles Municipal Code) Section 41.18, responding to crime trends within their area, and a commitment to addressing community concerns," the report said.

LAPD officials said the policy has had an "overwhelmingly positive" impact on public safety, helping reduce the number of encampments where chronic violence and crime had occurred.

The Council's Housing and Homeless Committee is expected to review the report later.

City Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky introduced a motion last year calling for a review of the anti-camping law's effectiveness. It took more than eight months for the report to come out.

Tso noted that her office received LAHSA findings in November 2023, but staff identified some discrepancies that needed to be examined.

In March, LAist obtained LAHSA's findings, which was to be part of Tso's report. At the time, the information had sparked some backlash from City Council members.

Housing and homeless advocates have long criticized the anti-camping law for what they have described as a policy meant to criminalize homeless individuals. There were also concerns that law was a waste of money and would not be an effective approach to reduce homelessness.

Support Provided By