D.A. Declares War on Marijuana Dispensaries
October 9, 2009
Support Provided By
Los Angeles D.A. Steve Cooley, after years of indecision the part of the City Council as to how to legally manage the medical pot distribution business, has decided that the way almost all L.A. medical marijuana dispensaries do business is illegal, and has vowed to prosecute.
From the L.A. Times's report:
Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley said Thursday he will prosecute medical marijuana dispensaries for over-the-counter sales, targeting a practice that has become commonplace under an initiative approved by California voters more than a decade ago."The vast, vast, vast majority, about 100%, of dispensaries in Los Angeles County and the city are operating illegally, they are dealing marijuana illegally, according to our theory," he said. "The time is right to deal with this problem." Cooley and Los Angeles City Atty. Carmen Trutanich recently concluded that state law bars sales of medical marijuana, an opinion that could spark a renewed effort by law enforcement across the state to rein in the use of marijuana. It comes as polls show a majority of state voters back legalization of marijuana, and supporters are working to place the issue on the ballot next year. The district attorney's office is investigating about a dozen dispensaries, following police raids, and is considering filing felony charges against one that straddles the Los Angeles-Culver City line. "We have our strategy and we think we are on good legal ground," Cooley said.
My colleague at Reason magazine, Jacob Sullum, who follows the drug beat closely, provides context for why Cooley's interpretation of the law shouldn't hold sway:
Cooley's position differs from those taken by other local officials and by California Attorney General Jerry Brown.Under state law, patients are allowed to grow marijuana for themselves, or their "primary caregivers" can grow it for them. Last November the California Supreme Court rejected a legal fiction under which many dispensaries had been operating, whereby patients would designate the people selling them marijuana as their primary caregivers. The court said the person who grows marijuana for a patient has to be a bona fide caregiver who is substantially involved in his life and assists him in ways other than supplying the drug. That decision left the "patient collective" as the only legally viable model for dispensaries.... Cooley argues that such collectives are simply for-profit businesses in disguise. But he also seems to be saying that the only way a collective can be legal is if every member contributes time and effort, as opposed to money. That seems like an unreasonable expectation for patients who go to dispensaries precisely because they are not up to the task of growing marijuana for themselves and don't know anyone who is willing and able to do it for them. Attorney General Brown, by contrast...does not insist that every member of a collective roll up his sleeves and get to work. The guidelines Brown issued in August 2008 say a collective should be nonprofit, should not purchase marijuana from illegal sources (effectively meaning the members have to grow their own supply), and should not provide marijuana to nonmembers. But in Brown's view, the marijuana may be "provided free to qualified patients...who are members of the collective or cooperative," "provided in exchange for services rendered to the entity," or "allocated based on fees that are reasonably calculated to cover overhead costs and operating expenses." That last option is essentially the same as over-the-counter sales....
Attorney General Brown's guidelines for legal medical pot dispensing here.Past City of Angles blogging about L.A.'s marijuana dispensaries here and here.
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Support Provided By